Dosimetric Comparison of Adjuvant Pelvic Radiotherapy for Endometrial Cancer using Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Helical Tomotherapy (HT)

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridkaya pepele, eda/0000-0002-9193-0961
dc.authorwosidkaya pepele, eda/HGE-0700-2022
dc.contributor.authorTemelli, Oztun
dc.contributor.authorDemirtas, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorSisecioglu, Mahmut Serdar
dc.contributor.authorPepele, Eda Kaya
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:10:01Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:10:01Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives:The purpose of the present study is to compare dosimetrically IMRT, VMAT, HT techniques in endometrium cancer adjuvant radiotherapy practice. Methods: The 10 patients to whom we had applied Pelvic RT due to endometrium cancer previously were selected retrospectively. All patients had received TAH+BSO+BPLND. Three different plans were made for the patients as IMRT, VMAT, and HT. Results: The rectum V40 was found to be 53%, 54%, 45% (p=0.002), respectively; and the bladder V45 was 27%, 26%, 20% (p=0.002), respectively. Bowel V40 was found to be 15%,17%,12%, respectively (p=<0.001). Total monitor unit (MU) and beam-on times were found superior at VMAT (<0.001). Bone marrow V40 was found to be 27%, 26%, 33%, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion: It was found that the three techniques were suitable in terms of planning criteria and OARs. HI and CI were found to be superior at HT. In risky organs, in rectum, bowel and bladder, HT was found to be superior than the others; in terms of bone marrow, IMRT was found to be superior; and in terms of bone, VMAT was found to be superior. VMAT has the advantage of having short treatment time and low MU.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/ejmo.2019.28670
dc.identifier.endpage210en_US
dc.identifier.issn2587-196X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087959703en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage203en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid333639en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/ejmo.2019.28670
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/333639
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/92561
dc.identifier.volume3en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000604249100008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKare Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEndometrial canceren_US
dc.subjectradiotherapyen_US
dc.titleDosimetric Comparison of Adjuvant Pelvic Radiotherapy for Endometrial Cancer using Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Helical Tomotherapy (HT)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu