Comparison of Sleep Quality, Comfort Level, and Related Factors in Patients Using the Sandbag or the Vascular Closure Device After Coronary Angiography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid58802580400
dc.authorscopusid57202834414
dc.contributor.authorBatmaz M.
dc.contributor.authorCengiz Z.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:03:47Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:03:47Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study was conducted to investigate whether sleep quality, comfort level, and related factors differ depending on the use of the sandbag or the vascular closure device after coronary angiography. Methods: This comparative and cross-sectional study was conducted on 210 patients (Sandbag: 105, Device: 105) who underwent coronary angiography in the coronary intensive care and cardiology service. Data were collected using a Descriptive Characteristics Form, a Coronary Angiography Follow-up Form, the Richard-Campbell Sleep Scale, and the Early Postoperative Comfort Scale. Results: Comfort scores were higher in patients using the device (4.02 ± 0.45) than those using the sandbag (3.8 ± 0.45). In both groups, pain negatively affected comfort. Mobilization had an effect on comfort only in patients using the sandbag and comfort was higher in mobilized patients. Sleep scores were higher in vascular closure device users (57.18 ± 17.69) than in sandbag users (51.99 ± 18.14). Severe pain, long surgical intervention time, and large hematoma size adversely affected sleep quality in patients using the sandbag. Conclusion: The use of sandbags and vascular closure devices in patients who have undergone coronary angiography affected sleep quality and patient comfort, and that device users were better in terms of comfort and sleep quality than sandbag users. © 2023 Investigaciones-Sociohistoricas Regionales. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/ArcHealthSciRes.2023.23031
dc.identifier.endpage200en_US
dc.identifier.issn2687-4644
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181828348en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage193en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/ArcHealthSciRes.2023.23031
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/92101
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAVESen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Health Science and Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectcomforten_US
dc.subjectCoronary angiographyen_US
dc.subjectsandbagen_US
dc.subjectsleepen_US
dc.subjectvascular closure devicesen_US
dc.titleComparison of Sleep Quality, Comfort Level, and Related Factors in Patients Using the Sandbag or the Vascular Closure Device After Coronary Angiographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu