The clinical effects of somatotype difference on isokinetic knee muscle strength and dynamic balance scores

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid57190176466
dc.authorscopusid6602962462
dc.authorscopusid54398851900
dc.authorscopusid36543531800
dc.authorscopusid7007145573
dc.authorscopusid55940918400
dc.authorscopusid55927343600
dc.contributor.authorŞenol D.
dc.contributor.authorÖzbağ D.
dc.contributor.authorKafkas M.E.
dc.contributor.authorAçak M.
dc.contributor.authorBaysal Ö.
dc.contributor.authorKafkas A.Ş.
dc.contributor.authorTaşkıran C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:01:13Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:01:13Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to present the somatotype features of young individuals without any symptoms and to identify whether isokinetic knee muscle strength and dynamic balance scores are affected by somatotype difference. Patients and methods: A total of 146 participants (88 males, 58 females; mean age 22.5±1.9 years; range 19 to 28 years) who had no symptoms were included in this study. Somatotypes of the participants were calculated using the Heath-Carter formula, and anthropometric measurements were taken from each participant. Knee flexion and extension muscle strengths at angular speeds of 90°/sec, 120°/sec and 150°/ sec were measured from the dominant and non-dominant limbs of the participants. Total balance, anterior/posterior balance, and medial/ lateral measurements were made to evaluate dynamic balance performances. Results: Six different somatotypes were found. Endomorphic mesomorph was the most common somatotype in 56 participants. There was no significant somatotype difference in men and women for dominant and non-dominant knee extension and flexion peak strength values at angular speeds of 90°/sec, 120°/sec and 150°/sec (p>0.05). No significant difference was found between the balance scores of men and women who had different somatotypes (p>0.05). Conclusion: Anatomic structure of the body, which is suitable for the sports branch, has an increasing effect on performance. © 2018 by Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInönü Üniversitesi: 2014/27en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by Inonu University BAP unit with project number 2014/27.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5606/tftrd.2017.883
dc.identifier.endpage36en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-0234
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85044333095en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage28en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2017.883
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/91340
dc.identifier.volume64en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkiye Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnthropometryen_US
dc.subjectDynamic balanceen_US
dc.subjectIsokinetic strengthen_US
dc.subjectSomatotypeen_US
dc.titleThe clinical effects of somatotype difference on isokinetic knee muscle strength and dynamic balance scoresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu