Comparison of Rotavirus Genotypes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

dc.contributor.authorAlici, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorTanriverdi, Elif Seren
dc.contributor.authorBudak, Ilayda
dc.contributor.authorAkkan, Murat
dc.contributor.authorYenisehirli, Gulgun
dc.contributor.authorOtlu, Baris
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-04T13:30:50Z
dc.date.available2026-04-04T13:30:50Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Rotaviruses are the leading cause of severe diarrhea in infants and young children worldwide. To date, 32 distinct G genotypes and 47 distinct P genotypes have been identified in group A rotaviruses. Following the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, our country implemented several measures that effectively reduced the incidence of infectious diseases, including acute gastroenteritis associated with COVID-19. In this study, we investigate whether the measures implemented following the COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in the rotavirus genotype distribution. Materials and Methods: A total of 128 stool samples that tested positive for rotavirus antigen- 64 from the pre-pandemic period and 64 from the pandemic period- were further analyzed for genotyping. As determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, rotavirus RNA was detected in 50 (78%) samples from the pre-pandemic period and 51 (80%) samples from the pandemic period. Results: In the pre-pandemic period, the following results were observed among the patients studied by us: G9P[8] in 24 (48%), G1P[8] in 14 (28%), G2P[8] in five (10%), G2P[4] in three (6%), G3P[8] in two (4%), G4P[8] in one (2%), and G9P[4] in one (2%). During the pandemic period, the following results were observed in the patients studied by us: G9P[8] in 28 (54%), G1P[8] in 12 (24%), G2P[8] in six (12%), G2P[4] in two (4%), G3P[8] in one (2%), G4P[8] in one (2%), and G9P[4] in one (2%). Conclusion: In our study, G9P[8] was the dominant genotype during both periods, showing no significant difference in rotavirus genotypes between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods.
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/mjima.galenos.2024.24243.18
dc.identifier.issn2147-673X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0449-0356
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0004-3681-859X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105029583834
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.trdizinid1281856
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/mjima.galenos.2024.24243.18
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1281856
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/108398
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001372862900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Publ House
dc.relation.ispartofMediterranean Journal of Infection Microbes and Antimicrobials
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250329
dc.subjectCOVID-19 pandemic
dc.subjectrotavirus
dc.subjectgenotype
dc.titleComparison of Rotavirus Genotypes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar