Comparison of medium-period outcomes of allografts and autografts used in repair of bone defects in patients who were treated in our department due to skeletal system tumors

dc.contributor.authorSevimli, Reşit
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-26T08:10:50Z
dc.date.available2018-09-26T08:10:50Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Objective: In orthopaedic oncology, reconstruction with autograft or allograft of bone defects which develop following tumor resection or curettage is a commonly used method. Bone generally has the ability to regenerate completely but requires a very small fracture space or some sort of scaffold to do so. Successful results of allografts or autograft in reconstruction of bone defect after tumor resection encouraged its utilization in post-traumatic defects. In this study, prospective representation of clinical and radiological medium-period outcomes of used autgrafts and allografts is aimed. Materials and Methods: 45 patients who were treated, for whom reconstruction was performed by using allograft or autograft following tumor excision or curettage between the years 2005-2015 in Inonu University Faculty of Medicine were included in the study. Patients were evaluated in regard to age, gender, tumor localization and union. Obtained data were analyzed by SPSS software version 15.0 Results: During follow-ups of the patients; union was radiologically observed in an average of 6.1 months in 43 (91%) patients (in 21 autografts it was 5.8 months, in 22 allografts it was 6.5 months). Nonunion occurred in 2 (9%) patients. No statistically significant difference was determined between groups with allografts and autografts (P>0.05). Conclusion: No difference was determined between use of either autogenous or allogenous grafts in segmental or cavitary bone defects, and reconstruction is a method with high success. Keywords: Allograft; Autograft; Bone Tumors.en_US
dc.identifier.citationResit S. Comparison of medium-period outcomes of allografts and autografts used in repair of bone defects in patients who were treated in our department due to skeletal system tumors. J Turgut Ozal Med Cent 2017;(24:2):187-9.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/jtomc.2017.03.041en_US
dc.identifier.endpage189en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-1744
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage188en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid284990en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/jtomc.2017.03.041
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/9009
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.totmdergisi.org/articles/2017/volume24/issue2/2017_24_2_14.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/284990
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAllograften_US
dc.subjectBone Tumorsen_US
dc.titleComparison of medium-period outcomes of allografts and autografts used in repair of bone defects in patients who were treated in our department due to skeletal system tumorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
2017_24_2_14.pdf
Boyut:
459.58 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale Dosyası
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: