Early Results of Anatomic Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

dc.authoridKarakaplan, Mustafa/0000-0001-9035-0319
dc.authoridOzen, Metehan/0000-0003-4088-3103
dc.authorwosidElmali, Nurzat/A-1017-2014
dc.authorwosidOzen, Metehan/X-2705-2018
dc.authorwosidKarakaplan, Mustafa/IXN-3318-2023
dc.authorwosidOzen, Metehan/E-2610-2016
dc.contributor.authorPepele, Demet
dc.contributor.authorKarakaplan, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorElmali, Nurzat
dc.contributor.authorTopgul, Haldun
dc.contributor.authorOzen, Metehan
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:09:47Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:09:47Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The goal in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is to restore the normal anatomic structure and function of the knee. In the significant proportion of patients after the traditional single-bundle ACLR, complaints of instability still continue. Anatomic double bundle ACLR may provide normal kinematics in knees, much closer to the natural anatomy. The aim of this study is to clinically assess the early outcomes of our anatomical double bundle ACLR. Material and Method: In our clinic between June 2009 and March 2010, performed the anatomic double bundle ACLR with autogenous hamstring grafts 20 patients were evaluated prospectively with Cincinnati, IKDC and Lysholm scores and in clinically for muscle strength and with Cybex II dynamometer. Results: The mean follow-up is 17.8 months (13-21 months). Patients' scores of Cincinnati, IKDC and Lysholm were respectively, preoperative 18.1, 39.3 and 39.8, while the post-op increased to 27.2, 76.3 and 86.3. In their last check, 17 percent of the patients according to IKDC scores (85%) A (excellent) and B (good) group and 3 patients took place as C (adequate) group. The power measurements of quadriceps and hamstring muscle groups of patients who underwent surgery showed no significant difference compared with the intact knees. Discussion: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction is a satisfactory method. There is a need comparative, long-term studies in large numbers in order to determine improving clinical outcome, preventing degeneration and restoring the knee biomechanics better.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4328/JCAM.1866
dc.identifier.endpage135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-0720
dc.identifier.issn1309-2014
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84928555531en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage131en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid184715en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.1866
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/184715
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/92435
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000376563600013en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherDerman Medical Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Analytical Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnterior Cruciate Ligamenten_US
dc.subjectKneeen_US
dc.subjectReconstructionen_US
dc.subjectDouble Bundleen_US
dc.titleEarly Results of Anatomic Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar