Comparison of Item Response Theory Scaling Methods with ROC Analysis
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2022
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Assoc Measurement & Evaluation Education & Psychology
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
In this study, one-dimensional item response theory models were evaluated using different scaling methods. In this context, the equating errors and the area under the curve of four scaling methods (Stocking-Lord, Heabara, Mean-Sigma, Mean-Mean), and one, two, and three parameters logistic models (1PL, 2PL, and 3PL) in nonequivalent groups with anchor test (NEAT) design were examined. Additionally, the equating errors of the scaling methods and the results obtained from ROC analysis were compared. Qatar's and Australia's PISA 2012 mathematical literacy test data were used in the study. The minimum error was obtained from the Mean-Mean method with the 1PL model, and the maximum error was obtained from the Mean-Mean method with the 3PL model. Similar results were observed in all comparisons and supported each other. It is concluded that ROC analysis can be used to compare different conditions, methods and models.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
test equating, ROC analysis, scaling methods, AUC
Kaynak
Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-Epod
WoS Q Değeri
N/A
Scopus Q Değeri
Q4
Cilt
13
Sayı
1
