Comparison of Item Response Theory Scaling Methods with ROC Analysis

dc.authoridYurtcu, Meltem/0000-0003-3303-5093
dc.authorwosidYurtcu, Meltem/ABH-6078-2020
dc.contributor.authorYurtcu, Meltem
dc.contributor.authorGuzeller, Cem Oktay
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T20:10:20Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T20:10:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİnönü Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, one-dimensional item response theory models were evaluated using different scaling methods. In this context, the equating errors and the area under the curve of four scaling methods (Stocking-Lord, Heabara, Mean-Sigma, Mean-Mean), and one, two, and three parameters logistic models (1PL, 2PL, and 3PL) in nonequivalent groups with anchor test (NEAT) design were examined. Additionally, the equating errors of the scaling methods and the results obtained from ROC analysis were compared. Qatar's and Australia's PISA 2012 mathematical literacy test data were used in the study. The minimum error was obtained from the Mean-Mean method with the 1PL model, and the maximum error was obtained from the Mean-Mean method with the 3PL model. Similar results were observed in all comparisons and supported each other. It is concluded that ROC analysis can be used to compare different conditions, methods and models.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21031/epod.892079
dc.identifier.endpage22en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-6575
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85152528221en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage15en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1069426en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.21031/epod.892079
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1069426
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11616/92707
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000790080800002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAssoc Measurement & Evaluation Education & Psychologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-Epoden_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjecttest equatingen_US
dc.subjectROC analysisen_US
dc.subjectscaling methodsen_US
dc.subjectAUCen_US
dc.titleComparison of Item Response Theory Scaling Methods with ROC Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar